10-Q: Quarterly report [Sections 13 or 15(d)]
Published on
Table of Contents
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One)
| þ | QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2005
OR
| o | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from
to
Commission file number: 001-13122
RELIANCE STEEL & ALUMINUM CO.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
| California | 95-1142616 | |
| (State or other jurisdiction of | (I.R.S. Employer | |
| incorporation or organization) | Identification No.) |
350 South Grand Avenue, Suite 5100
Los Angeles, California 90071
(213) 687-7700
(Address of principal executive offices and telephone number)
Los Angeles, California 90071
(213) 687-7700
(Address of principal executive offices and telephone number)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed
by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or
for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the
past 90 days. Yes þ No ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule
12b-2 of the
Act). Yes þ No ¨
As of July 31, 2005, 32,964,049 shares of the registrant’s common stock, no par value, were
outstanding.
RELIANCE STEEL & ALUMINUM CO.
INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
PART I — FINANCIAL INFORMATION |
1 | |||||||
| 1 | ||||||||
| 2 | ||||||||
| 3 | ||||||||
| 4 | ||||||||
| 5 | ||||||||
| 11 | ||||||||
| 15 | ||||||||
| 15 | ||||||||
| 16 | ||||||||
| 16 | ||||||||
| 16 | ||||||||
| 17 | ||||||||
CERTIFICATIONS |
18 | |||||||
| Exhibit 31.1 | ||||||||
| Exhibit 31.2 | ||||||||
| Exhibit 32 | ||||||||
i
Table of Contents
RELIANCE STEEL & ALUMINUM CO.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(In thousands except share amounts)
(In thousands except share amounts)
| June 30, | December 31, | |||||||
| 2005 | 2004 | |||||||
| (Unaudited) | ||||||||
ASSETS |
||||||||
Current assets: |
||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
$ | 16,210 | $ | 11,659 | ||||
Accounts receivable, less allowance for doubtful accounts of
$9,865 at June 30, 2005 and $8,699 at December 31, 2004 |
362,030 | 329,991 | ||||||
Inventories |
369,665 | 349,779 | ||||||
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
15,183 | 17,216 | ||||||
Deferred income taxes |
24,592 | 24,584 | ||||||
Total current assets |
787,680 | 733,229 | ||||||
Property, plant and equipment, at cost: |
||||||||
Land |
58,887 | 57,982 | ||||||
Buildings |
262,917 | 261,228 | ||||||
Machinery and equipment |
383,521 | 370,229 | ||||||
Accumulated depreciation |
(247,383 | ) | (230,626 | ) | ||||
| 457,942 | 458,813 | |||||||
Goodwill |
341,780 | 341,780 | ||||||
Other assets (including intangibles not subject to amortization) |
29,670 | 29,509 | ||||||
Total assets |
$ | 1,617,072 | $ | 1,563,331 | ||||
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY |
||||||||
Current liabilities: |
||||||||
Accounts payable |
$ | 157,446 | $ | 140,323 | ||||
Accrued expenses |
19,066 | 17,561 | ||||||
Accrued compensation and retirement costs |
36,922 | 49,959 | ||||||
Accrued insurance costs |
24,502 | 20,297 | ||||||
Deferred income taxes |
138 | 138 | ||||||
Current maturities of long-term debt |
48,525 | 46,400 | ||||||
Total current liabilities |
286,599 | 274,678 | ||||||
Long-term debt |
325,475 | 380,850 | ||||||
Long-term retirement costs |
15,435 | 14,102 | ||||||
Deferred income taxes |
55,613 | 55,613 | ||||||
Minority interest |
13,882 | 15,536 | ||||||
Commitments and contingencies |
¾ | ¾ | ||||||
Shareholders’ equity: |
||||||||
Preferred stock, no par value: Authorized shares — 5,000,000 None issued or outstanding |
¾ | ¾ | ||||||
Common stock, no par value: Authorized shares — 100,000,000 Issued and outstanding shares — 32,925,924 at June 30, 2005 and 32,669,967 at December 31, 2004, stated capital |
320,402 | 313,953 | ||||||
Retained earnings |
599,145 | 508,147 | ||||||
Accumulated other comprehensive income |
521 | 452 | ||||||
Total shareholders’ equity |
920,068 | 822,552 | ||||||
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity |
$ | 1,617,072 | $ | 1,563,331 | ||||
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
1
Table of Contents
RELIANCE STEEL & ALUMINUM CO.
UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
(In thousands except share and per share amounts)
(In thousands except share and per share amounts)
| Three Months Ended | ||||||||
| June 30, | ||||||||
| 2005 | 2004 | |||||||
Net sales |
$ | 816,342 | $ | 760,780 | ||||
Other income, net |
699 | 1,386 | ||||||
| 817,041 | 762,166 | |||||||
Costs and expenses: |
||||||||
Cost of sales (exclusive of depreciation and amortization shown below) |
594,107 | 532,313 | ||||||
Warehouse, delivery, selling, general and administrative |
123,571 | 120,723 | ||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
12,107 | 11,066 | ||||||
Interest |
6,206 | 7,256 | ||||||
| 735,991 | 671,358 | |||||||
Income before minority interest and income taxes |
81,050 | 90,808 | ||||||
Minority interest |
(1,940 | ) | (3,798 | ) | ||||
Income from continuing operations before income taxes |
79,110 | 87,010 | ||||||
Provision for income taxes |
30,061 | 34,213 | ||||||
Net income |
$ | 49,049 | $ | 52,797 | ||||
Earnings per share: |
||||||||
Income from continuing operations – diluted |
$ | 1.48 | $ | 1.62 | ||||
Weighted average shares outstanding – diluted |
33,086,102 | 32,674,395 | ||||||
Income from continuing operations – basic |
$ | 1.49 | $ | 1.63 | ||||
Weighted average shares outstanding – basic |
32,915,847 | 32,446,394 | ||||||
Cash dividends per share |
$ | .09 | $ | .06 | ||||
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
2
Table of Contents
RELIANCE STEEL & ALUMINUM CO.
UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
(In thousands except share and per share amounts)
(In thousands except share and per share amounts)
| Six Months Ended | ||||||||
| June 30, | ||||||||
| 2005 | 2004 | |||||||
Net sales |
$ | 1,628,249 | $ | 1,416,545 | ||||
Other income, net |
1,364 | 1,893 | ||||||
| 1,629,613 | 1,418,438 | |||||||
Costs and expenses: |
||||||||
Cost of sales (exclusive of depreciation and amortization shown below) |
1,190,078 | 1,000,648 | ||||||
Warehouse, delivery, selling, general and administrative |
245,353 | 239,229 | ||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
23,269 | 22,112 | ||||||
Interest |
12,507 | 14,736 | ||||||
| 1,471,207 | 1,276,725 | |||||||
Income before minority interest and income taxes |
158,406 | 141,713 | ||||||
Minority interest |
(4,516 | ) | (5,545 | ) | ||||
Income from continuing operations before income taxes |
153,890 | 136,168 | ||||||
Provision for income taxes |
58,478 | 53,532 | ||||||
Net income |
$ | 95,412 | $ | 82,636 | ||||
Earnings per share: |
||||||||
Income from continuing operations – diluted |
$ | 2.89 | $ | 2.54 | ||||
Weighted average shares outstanding – diluted |
33,023,552 | 32,564,497 | ||||||
Income from continuing operations – basic |
$ | 2.90 | $ | 2.55 | ||||
Weighted average shares outstanding – basic |
32,848,990 | 32,369,777 | ||||||
Cash dividends per share |
$ | .18 | $ | .12 | ||||
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
3
Table of Contents
RELIANCE STEEL & ALUMINUM CO.
UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(In thousands)
(In thousands)
| Six Months Ended | ||||||||
| June 30, | ||||||||
| 2005 | 2004 | |||||||
Operating activities: |
||||||||
Net income |
$ | 95,412 | $ | 82,636 | ||||
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by
operating activities: Depreciation and amortization |
23,269 | 22,112 | ||||||
Loss (gain) on sales of machinery and equipment |
2 | (667 | ) | |||||
Deferred income taxes |
(14 | ) | — | |||||
Minority interest |
4,516 | 5,545 | ||||||
Tax benefit on stock options exercised |
1,509 | 1,188 | ||||||
Changes in operating assets and liabilities: |
||||||||
Accounts receivable |
(32,039 | ) | (122,701 | ) | ||||
Inventories |
(19,886 | ) | (54,034 | ) | ||||
Prepaid expenses and other assets |
(597 | ) | (2,743 | ) | ||||
Accounts payable and accrued expenses |
11,129 | 72,390 | ||||||
Net cash provided by operating activities |
83,301 | 3,726 | ||||||
Investing activities: |
||||||||
Purchases of property, plant and equipment, net |
(21,060 | ) | (15,883 | ) | ||||
Proceeds from sales of property and equipment |
1,129 | 2,408 | ||||||
Tax reimbursements made related to prior acquisition |
¾ | (16,475 | ) | |||||
Net cash used in investing activities |
(19,931 | ) | (29,950 | ) | ||||
Financing activities: |
||||||||
Proceeds from borrowings |
187,000 | 144,000 | ||||||
Principal payments on long-term debt and short-term borrowings |
(240,250 | ) | (120,250 | ) | ||||
Payments to minority shareholders |
(6,170 | ) | ¾ | |||||
Dividends paid |
(5,923 | ) | (3,884 | ) | ||||
Exercise of stock options |
6,203 | 6,371 | ||||||
Issuance of common stock |
246 | 236 | ||||||
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities |
(58,894 | ) | 26,473 | |||||
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash |
75 | 177 | ||||||
Increase in cash and cash equivalents |
4,551 | 426 | ||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period |
11,659 | 2,166 | ||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
$ | 16,210 | $ | 2,592 | ||||
Supplemental cash flow information: |
||||||||
Interest paid during the period |
$ | 12,372 | $ | 14,618 | ||||
Income taxes paid during the period |
$ | 57,994 | $ | 40,285 | ||||
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
4
Table of Contents
RELIANCE STEEL & ALUMINUM CO.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)
(UNAUDITED)
1. Basis of Presentation
The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America for interim financial
information and with the instructions of Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly,
they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States of America for complete financial statements. In the
opinion of management, all adjustments, consisting only of normal recurring adjustments, necessary
for a fair presentation with respect to the interim financial statements have been included. The
results of operations for the three- and six-month periods ended June 30, 2005 are not necessarily
indicative of the results for the full year ending December 31, 2005. For further information,
refer to the consolidated financial statements and footnotes thereto for the year ended December
31, 2004, included in the Reliance Steel & Aluminum Co. Form 10-K.
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted
in the United States requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported
amounts and the disclosure of contingent amounts in the Company’s consolidated financial statements
and the accompanying notes. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Certain prior year
amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current year presentation.
The Company’s consolidated financial statements include the assets, liabilities and operating
results of majority-owned subsidiaries. The ownership of the other interest holders of consolidated
subsidiaries is reflected as minority interest. All significant intercompany accounts and
transactions have been eliminated.
2. Impact of Recently Issued Accounting Principles
In April 2005, the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) approved a new rule
that delays the effective date of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 123R,
Share-Based Payment. Except for this deferral of the effective date, the guidance in SFAS No. 123R
is unchanged. Under the SEC’s rule, SFAS No. 123R is now effective for the Company for annual,
rather than interim, periods that begin after June 15, 2005. The Company will apply this Statement
to all awards granted on or after January 1, 2006 and to awards modified, repurchased, or cancelled
after that date. We expect that the implementation of the provisions of SFAS No. 123R will have an
impact consistent with our disclosures included under SFAS No. 148 in our December 31, 2004 Form
10-K.
In May 2005, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 154, “Accounting
Changes and Error Corrections—A Replacement of APB Opinion No. 20 and FASB Statement No. 3.” SFAS
No. 154 requires retrospective application to prior periods’ financial statements for changes in
accounting principle, unless it is impracticable to determine either the period-specific effects
or the cumulative effect of the change. SFAS No. 154 is effective for accounting changes and
corrections of errors made in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2005.
In June 2005, the Financial Accounting Standards Board’s (“FASB”) Emerging Issues Task
Force reached a consensus on Issue No. 05-6, “Determining the Amortization Period for
Leasehold Improvements” (“EITF 05-6”). The guidance requires that leasehold improvements acquired
in a business combination or purchased subsequent to the inception of a lease be amortized over the
lesser of the useful life of the assets or a term that includes renewals that are
reasonably assured at the date of the business combination or purchase. The guidance is
effective for periods beginning after June 29, 2005. The adoption of EITF 05-6 will not have an
impact on our consolidated financial statements.
5
Table of Contents
RELIANCE STEEL & ALUMINUM CO.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)
(UNAUDITED)
3. Long-Term Debt
Long-term debt consists of the following:
| June 30, | December 31, | |||||||
| 2005 | 2004 | |||||||
| (In thousands) | ||||||||
Revolving line of credit ($335,000,000 limit) originally due
October 24, 2006, closed June 13, 2005, interest
at variable rates, weighted average rate of 3.66% during
the six
months ended June 30, 2005 |
$ | — | $ | 30,000 | ||||
Revolving line of credit ($600,000,000 limit) due June 22,
2010,
interest at variable rates |
— | — | ||||||
Senior unsecured notes due from January 2, 2007 to
January
2, 2009, average fixed interest rate of 7.33% |
30,000 | 53,000 | ||||||
Senior unsecured notes due from January 2, 2006 to
January
2, 2008, average fixed interest rate of 7.06% |
55,000 | 55,000 | ||||||
Senior unsecured notes due from October 15, 2005 to
October
15, 2010, average fixed interest rate of 6.55% |
150,000 | 150,000 | ||||||
Senior unsecured notes due from July 1, 2011 to July 2, 2013,
average fixed interest rate of 5.14% |
135,000 | 135,000 | ||||||
Variable Rate Demand Industrial Development Revenue
Bonds,
Series 1989 A, due July 1, 2014, with interest
payable
quarterly; average interest rate during the six
months
ended June 30, 2005 of 2.28% |
2,450 | 2,450 | ||||||
Variable Rate Demand Revenue Bonds, Series 1999, due
March
1, 2009, with interest payable quarterly; average
interest rate during the six months ended
June
30, 2005 of 2.49% |
1,550 | 1,800 | ||||||
Total |
374,000 | 427,250 | ||||||
Less amounts due within one year |
(48,525 | ) | (46,400 | ) | ||||
Total long-term debt |
$ | 325,475 | $ | 380,850 | ||||
The Company had a five-year syndicated credit agreement, as amended, with ten banks for an
unsecured revolving line of credit with a borrowing limit of $335,000,000. On June 13, 2005, the
Company entered into a new syndicated Credit Agreement with 15 banks as lenders. The Credit
Agreement provides for an unsecured, $600,000,000 revolving credit facility with a term of five
years and replaces the Company’s previous $335,000,000 credit facility. The Company intends to use
the new credit facility for working capital and general corporate purposes, internal growth
initiatives and
funding acquisitions. The syndicated credit facility includes a commitment fee on the unused
portion, currently at an annual rate of 0.125%.
At June 30, 2005 the Company also had $15,605,000 of letters of credit outstanding under the
syndicated credit facility with availability to issue an additional $34,395,000 of letters of
credit.
The Company has $370,000,000 of outstanding senior unsecured notes issued in private placements of
debt. The outstanding senior notes bear interest at an average fixed rate of 6.17% and have an
average remaining life of 4.5 years, maturing from 2005 to 2013.
Both the $335,000,000 syndicated credit agreement and the senior notes became secured on July 1,
2003 concurrent with the Company’s acquisition of Precision Strip, Inc. The personal property
pledged as collateral included, but was not limited to, the outstanding securities of each of the
Company’s material corporate subsidiaries. The security interest was to terminate when the Company
met certain conditions, including a required leverage ratio. In the first quarter of 2005 the
security interest granted under our $335,000,000 syndicated credit facility and our senior note
6
Table of Contents
RELIANCE STEEL & ALUMINUM CO.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)
(UNAUDITED)
agreements was automatically released as the Company met the required conditions of the release.
The senior note agreements and the $600,000,000 credit facility are unsecured.
The $600,000,000 syndicated credit agreement also requires the Company to maintain a minimum net
worth and interest coverage ratio, a maximum leverage ratio, and includes certain restrictions on
the amount of cash dividends the Company may pay, among other things.
4. Shareholders’ Equity
In the six months ended June 30, 2005, the Company issued 250,375 shares of common stock in
connection with the exercise of employee stock options for total proceeds of approximately
$6,203,000. The tax benefit to the Company associated with these exercises amounted to
approximately $1,509,000. In addition, 5,582 shares of common stock were issued to division
managers of the Company in February 2005 under the Key Man Incentive Plan for 2004. In May 2005,
the Company amended and restated its stock repurchase program, authorizing up to an additional
6,000,000 shares of its common stock to be repurchased. The Company did not repurchase any shares
of its common stock during the six-month period ended June 30, 2005.
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 130, Reporting Comprehensive Income,
defines comprehensive income (loss) as non-stockholder changes in equity. Comprehensive income (loss) for
each of the three- and six-month periods ended June 30, 2005 and 2004, respectively, included the
following:
| Three Months Ended June 30, | Six Months Ended June 30, | |||||||||||||||
| 2005 | 2004 | 2005 | 2004 | |||||||||||||
| (In thousands) | ||||||||||||||||
Net income |
$ | 49,049 | $ | 52,797 | $ | 95,412 | $ | 82,636 | ||||||||
Other comprehensive income (loss): |
||||||||||||||||
Foreign currency translation income (loss) |
(171 | ) | 23 | 75 | 88 | |||||||||||
Unrealized gain/(loss) on investments,
net of tax |
60 | 37 | (6 | ) | 10 | |||||||||||
Total other comprehensive income (loss) |
(111 | ) | 60 | 69 | 98 | |||||||||||
Total comprehensive income |
$ | 48,938 | $ | 52,857 | $ | 95,481 | $ | 82,734 | ||||||||
Accumulated other comprehensive income included the following:
| June 30, | December 31, | |||||||
| 2005 | 2004 | |||||||
| (In thousands) | ||||||||
Foreign currency translation adjustments |
$ | 1,574 | $ | 1,499 | ||||
Unrealized gain on investments |
82 | 88 | ||||||
Minimum pension liability |
(1,135 | ) | (1,135 | ) | ||||
| $ | 521 | $ | 452 | |||||
Foreign currency translation adjustments are not generally adjusted for income taxes as they relate
to indefinite investments in foreign subsidiaries. Unrealized gain on investments and minimum
pension liability are net of taxes of $(49,000) and $694,000, respectively, as of June 30, 2005 and
$(54,000) and $692,000 respectively, as of December 31, 2004.
7
Table of Contents
RELIANCE STEEL & ALUMINUM CO.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)
(UNAUDITED)
5. Stock Option Plans
In accordance with SFAS No. 148, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation-Transition and Disclosure,
the Company continues to account for stock-based compensation plans using the intrinsic value-based
method of accounting prescribed by Accounting Principles Board Opinion (“APB”) No. 25, Accounting
for Stock Issued to Employees and related interpretations. Under APB No. 25, because the exercise
price of the Company’s employee stock options equals the market price of the underlying stock at
the date of grant, no compensation expense is recognized.
If the Company had elected to recognize compensation cost based on the estimated fair value of the
options granted at the grant date as prescribed by SFAS No. 148, net income and earnings per share
would have been reduced to the pro forma amounts shown below:
| Three Months Ended June 30, | Six Months Ended June 30, | |||||||||||||||
| 2005 | 2004 | 2005 | 2004 | |||||||||||||
| (In thousands, except per share amounts) | ||||||||||||||||
Reported net income |
$ | 49,049 | $ | 52,797 | $ | 95,412 | $ | 82,636 | ||||||||
Stock-based employee compensation
cost, net of tax |
248 | 291 | 507 | 588 | ||||||||||||
Pro forma net income |
$ | 48,801 | $ | 52,506 | $ | 94,905 | $ | 82,048 | ||||||||
Earnings per share from
continuing operations: |
||||||||||||||||
Basic — reported |
$ | 1.49 | $ | 1.63 | $ | 2.90 | $ | 2.55 | ||||||||
Basic — pro forma |
$ | 1.48 | $ | 1.62 | $ | 2.89 | $ | 2.53 | ||||||||
Diluted — reported |
$ | 1.48 | $ | 1.62 | $ | 2.89 | $ | 2.54 | ||||||||
Diluted — pro forma |
$ | 1.47 | $ | 1.61 | $ | 2.87 | $ | 2.52 | ||||||||
6. Employee Benefits
The Company maintains a Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan (“SERP”), which is a nonqualified
pension plan that provides post-retirement pension benefits to key officers of the Company.
Separate SERP plans exist for one of the companies acquired during 1998 and for the Company’s
50.5%-owned company, each of which provides post-retirement benefits to its respective key
employees.
The Company maintains, through various subsidiaries, defined benefit pension plans for certain of
its employees. These plans generally provide benefits of stated amounts for each year of service
or provide benefits based on the participant’s hourly wage rate and years of service.
8
Table of Contents
RELIANCE STEEL & ALUMINUM CO.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)
(UNAUDITED)
The net periodic pension costs for the SERP and defined benefit plans were as follows (in
thousands):
| SERP Plans | Defined Benefit Plans | |||||||||||||||
| Three Months Ended June 30, | 2005 | 2004 | 2005 | 2004 | ||||||||||||
Service Cost |
$ | 103 | $ | 98 | $ | 91 | $ | 80 | ||||||||
Interest Cost |
216 | 198 | 117 | 106 | ||||||||||||
Expected return on assets |
— | — | (128 | ) | (125 | ) | ||||||||||
Amortization of prior service cost |
49 | 49 | (1 | ) | (1 | ) | ||||||||||
Amortization of net loss |
40 | 28 | 7 | — | ||||||||||||
Net periodic pension cost |
$ | 408 | $ | 373 | $ | 86 | $ | 60 | ||||||||
| SERP Plans | Defined Benefit Plans | |||||||||||||||
| Six Months Ended June 30, | 2005 | 2004 | 2005 | 2004 | ||||||||||||
Service Cost |
$ | 206 | $ | 196 | $ | 182 | $ | 160 | ||||||||
Interest Cost |
432 | 396 | 235 | 212 | ||||||||||||
Expected return on assets |
— | — | (257 | ) | (250 | ) | ||||||||||
Amortization of prior service cost |
98 | 98 | (3 | ) | (2 | ) | ||||||||||
Amortization of net loss |
80 | 56 | 15 | — | ||||||||||||
Net periodic pension cost |
$ | 816 | $ | 746 | $ | 172 | $ | 120 | ||||||||
The Company previously disclosed in its financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2004,
included in its Form 10-K, that it expected to contribute $1,697,000 to its defined benefit plans
in 2005. As of June 30, 2005, contributions of $376,000 had been made. The Company also disclosed
in its Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004 that it terminated one of the defined benefit
plans as of that date and expects to distribute the assets in 2005.
9
Table of Contents
RELIANCE STEEL & ALUMINUM CO.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)
(UNAUDITED)
7. Earnings Per Share
The Company calculates basic and diluted earnings per share as required by SFAS No. 128, Earnings
Per Share. Basic earnings per share exclude any dilutive effects of options, warrants and
convertible securities. Diluted earnings per share is calculated including the dilutive effects of
warrants, options, and convertible securities, if any.
The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted earnings per share:
| Three Months Ended June 30, | Six Months Ended June 30, | |||||||||||||||
| 2005 | 2004 | 2005 | 2004 | |||||||||||||
| (In thousands, except per share amounts) | ||||||||||||||||
Numerator: |
||||||||||||||||
Net income |
$ | 49,049 | $ | 52,797 | $ | 95,412 | $ | 82,636 | ||||||||
Denominator: |
||||||||||||||||
Denominator for basic earnings per
share from continuing operations: |
||||||||||||||||
Weighted average shares |
32,916 | 32,446 | 32,849 | 32,370 | ||||||||||||
Effect of dilutive securities: |
||||||||||||||||
Stock options |
170 | 228 | 175 | 194 | ||||||||||||
Denominator for dilutive earnings per
share from continuing
operations: |
||||||||||||||||
Adjusted weighted average shares and
assumed conversions |
33,086 | 32,674 | 33,024 | 32,564 | ||||||||||||
Earnings per share from continuing
operations – diluted |
$ | 1.48 | $ | 1.62 | $ | 2.89 | $ | 2.54 | ||||||||
Earnings per share from continuing
operations – basic |
$ | 1.49 | $ | 1.63 | $ | 2.90 | $ | 2.55 | ||||||||
There were no anti-dilutive shares reserved for issuance upon exercise of stock options for
the three and six months ended June 30, 2005 and 2004.
8. Subsequent Event
On July 1, 2005, the Company acquired 100% of the outstanding capital stock of Chapel Steel Corp. (“Chapel”),
headquartered in Spring House (Philadelphia), Pennsylvania. The Company paid $94,200,000 in cash
plus the assumption of approximately $16,800,000 of debt for all of the outstanding capital stock
of Chapel.
Chapel is a privately held metals service center company founded in 1972 that processes and
distributes carbon and alloy steel plate products from five facilities in Pottstown (Philadelphia),
PA; Bourbonnais (Chicago), IL; Houston, TX; Birmingham, AL; and Portland, OR. Chapel also
warehouses and distributes its products in Cincinnati, OH and
Hamilton, Ontario, Canada. Chapel’s net sales for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004 were
approximately $273,000,000. Chapel will operate as a wholly-owned subsidiary of Reliance. The
acquisition was funded on July 1, 2005 with borrowings on the Company’s existing $600,000,000
syndicated credit facility.
10
Table of Contents
RELIANCE STEEL & ALUMINUM CO.
Item 2. Management’s Discussion And Analysis of Financial Condition And Results of Operations
The following table sets forth certain income statement data for the three- and six-month periods
ended June 30, 2005 and 2004 (dollars are shown in thousands and certain amounts may not calculate
due to rounding):
| Three Months Ended June 30, | Six Months Ended June 30, | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2005 | 2004 | 2005 | 2004 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| % of | % of | % of | % of | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| $ | Net Sales | $ | Net Sales | $ | Net Sales | $ | Net Sales | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net sales |
$ | 816,342 | 100.0 | % | $ | 760,780 | 100.0 | % | $ | 1,628,249 | 100.0 | % | $ | 1,416,545 | 100.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Gross profit |
222,235 | 27.2 | 228,467 | 30.0 | 438,171 | 26.9 | 415,897 | 29.4 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
S,G&A expenses |
123,571 | 15.1 | 120,723 | 15.9 | 245,353 | 15.1 | 239,229 | 16.9 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Depreciation expense |
10,423 | 1.3 | 10,266 | 1.3 | 20,800 | 1.3 | 20,494 | 1.4 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Operating profit(1) |
$ | 88,241 | 10.8 | % | $ | 97,478 | 12.8 | % | $ | 172,018 | 10.6 | % | $ | 156,174 | 11.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||
| (1) | Excludes other income, amortization expense, minority interest expense, interest expense, and income tax expense. |
Three Months Ended June 30, 2005 Compared to Three Months Ended June 30, 2004
Our 2005 second quarter consolidated sales were our highest ever at $816.3 million, up 7.3% from
our 2004 second quarter sales. This includes a 6.7% decrease in our tons sold and a 14.8% increase
in our average selling price per ton sold (the tons sold and average selling price per ton sold
exclude the amounts related to Precision Strip).
We believe that our volume declined in the 2005 second quarter because there was an unusually high
volume of purchases in the 2004 second quarter in advance of announced price increases for carbon
steel products. Our average selling price per ton sold increased by 14.8% because of increased
costs for most products that we sell and a shift in product mix. Carbon steel costs rose
significantly beginning in the second quarter of 2004, and, although these costs have declined
somewhat in 2005, the 2005 second quarter average cost is above the 2004 second quarter average
cost. Aluminum and stainless steel costs for aerospace products increased steadily throughout 2004
and have continued to increase through the first half of 2005. The improved demand for aerospace
products has also resulted in a slight shift in product mix with aluminum, stainless steel and
titanium products increasing as a percent of our sales. Carbon steel sales as a percent of our
total sales decreased 6.4% in the 2005 second quarter compared to the 2004 second quarter. The
shift to higher priced products also contributed to our increased average selling prices in the
second quarter of 2005.
Our 2005 second quarter gross profit was $222.2 million, down 2.7% from the 2004 second quarter.
Gross profit as a percentage of sales in the 2005 second quarter was 27.2%, down from 30.0% in the
2004 second quarter, but up from 26.6% in the 2005 first quarter. During the second quarter of
2004, we were able to expand our gross profit margin due to our ability to pass the significant
carbon steel cost increases on to our customers before we received the higher cost material in our
inventory. In the 2005 second quarter the higher carbon steel costs are fully reflected and
selling prices for most of these products declined during the quarter which reduced our gross
profit margin. Our second quarter 2005 results had no incremental LIFO expense compared to $32.5
million in the second quarter of 2004. The difference was mainly because of the decline in costs
for carbon steel products.
Warehouse, delivery, selling, general and administrative (“S,G&A”) expenses increased $2.8 million,
or 2.4%, compared to the 2004 second quarter due mainly to general increases for labor, insurance
and other costs. S,G&A expenses as a percentage of sales for the 2005 second quarter were 15.1%,
down from 15.9% for the 2004 second
11
Table of Contents
quarter, due mainly to our increased selling prices.
Depreciation expense in the 2005 second quarter was $10.4 million compared to $10.3 million in the
2004 second quarter. Amortization expense was $2.5 million in the 2005 second quarter compared to
$0.8 million in the 2004 second quarter. The increase was mainly due to the write-off of the
deferred financing costs related to our $335 million syndicated credit facility that we replaced in
June of 2005.
Operating profit in the 2005 second quarter was $88.2 million, or 10.8% of sales, compared to $97.5
million, or 12.8% of sales, in the 2004 second quarter. The decrease is mainly due to lower gross
profit margins in 2005, as discussed above.
Interest expense decreased to $6.2 million in the 2005 second quarter from $7.3 million in the 2004
second quarter, due to lower borrowing levels because of the strong cash flow that we generated in
late 2004 and the first half of 2005. Also, the pricing on our credit facility decreased due to
our improved profitability levels.
Minority interest expense in the 2005 second quarter decreased by $1.9 million from the 2004 second
quarter mainly because we purchased the remaining 30.5% interest from the other shareholder in
Valex Korea in July of 2004. The 2005 minority interest represents the net income attributed to
the 49.5% of American Steel, L.L.C. that we do not own.
Our effective income tax rate for the 2005 second quarter was 38.0%, down from 39.3% in the 2004
second quarter. Our 2004 full-year tax rate was 37.1%. The changes in our tax rate are mainly due
to changes in the geographic composition of our income, lower tax rates from our foreign operations
and benefits from state and city income tax credits.
Six Months Ended June 30, 2005 Compared to Six Months Ended June 30, 2004
Our 2005 six-month consolidated sales of $1.63 billion were up 14.9% from the 2004 six-month
period. This includes an 11.2% decrease in tons sold and a 29.6% increase in our average selling
price per ton.
Our volume was down from the prior year period mainly because of the unusually high volume of
purchases that occurred in the first half of 2004 when our customers were trying to build inventory
ahead of the significant carbon steel price increases that occurred in the first half of 2004.
Because carbon steel prices have been declining in 2005, our customers are not building inventory.
However, demand for aerospace products has increased in 2005 over the 2004 periods. Our average
selling price per ton sold increased because of increased costs for most products that we sell and
a shift in product mix compared to the prior year period. The shift to higher priced aluminum,
stainless steel and titanium products contributed to our increased average selling prices in the
2005 six-month period.
Our gross profit for the 2005 six-month period was $438.2 million compared to $415.9 million in
2004 because of our higher sales levels in 2005. However, our gross profit margin in the 2005
six-month period was 26.9%, down from 29.4% in the 2004 six-month period. Our 2004 gross profit
margin reflected our ability to pass the significant carbon steel cost increases on to our
customers before we received the higher cost material in our inventory, especially in the second
quarter of 2004.
Our LIFO expense for the 2005 six-month period is significantly lower than in the same period of
2004 mainly because of changes in our costs for carbon steel products. Costs for carbon steel
products have declined in 2005 from the beginning of the year. However, the increased costs of
aluminum and stainless steel products have more than offset the LIFO impact of the decline. For
the 2005 six-month period, we recorded LIFO expense, which is included in our cost of sales, of
$12.5 million compared to LIFO expense of $60 million in the 2004 six-month period.
In the 2005 six-month period our warehouse, delivery, selling, general and administrative (S,G&A)
expenses increased $6.1 million, or 2.6% compared to 2004. The expenses as a percent of sales in
the 2005 six-month period were 15.1% compared to 16.9% in the 2004 period. The declines as a
percent of sales are mainly due to our increased selling prices in 2005.
12
Table of Contents
Depreciation expense for the 2005 six-month period was $20.8 million compared to $20.5 million in
2004. Amortization expense increased $0.9 million in the 2005 six-month period due to the
write-off of deferred financing costs related to our $335 million syndicated credit facility that
we replaced in June of 2005.
Our 2005 six-month operating profit was $172.0 million, resulting in an operating profit margin of
10.6%, compared to $156.2 million, or an 11.0% operating profit margin in the 2004 period. Our
higher sales levels provided increased operating profit dollars in 2005, although our increased
metal costs resulted in a slightly lower operating profit margin.
Interest expense for the 2005 six-month period decreased $2.2 million, or 15.1%, due to lower
borrowing levels because of the strong cash flow that we generated over the last year. Also, the
pricing on our credit facility decreased due to our improved profitability levels.
In the 2005 six-month period minority interest expense decreased from the 2004 six-month period
mainly because we purchased the remaining 30.5% interest from the other shareholder in Valex Korea
in July of 2004.
Our 2005 six-month period effective income tax rate was 38.0%, down from 39.3% in the 2004
six-month period. The full-year 2004 rate was 37.1%. The changes in our tax rate are mainly due
to changes in the geographic composition of our income, lower tax rates from our foreign operations
and benefits from state and city income tax credits.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
At June 30, 2005, our working capital was $501.1 million compared to $458.6 million at December 31,
2004. The increase was mainly due to an increase in our accounts receivable of $32.0 million and
an increase in our inventory of $19.9 million resulting from improved sales levels, offset by
higher accounts payable and accrued expense balances of $11.1 million mainly due to our increased
inventory purchases in 2005 to support our increased sales levels.
To manage our working capital, we focus on our number of days sales outstanding to monitor accounts
receivable and on our inventory turnover rate to monitor our inventory levels, as receivables and
inventory are our two most significant elements of working capital. As of June 30, 2005, our days
sales outstanding were approximately 41 days, consistent with our rate at December 31, 2004. (We
calculate our days sales outstanding as an average of the most recent two-month period.) Our
inventory turn rate at June 30, 2005 was about 4.9 times, down slightly from 5.1 times in 2004.
Our primary sources of liquidity are generally from internally generated funds from operations and
our revolving line of credit. Cash flow provided by operations was $83.3 million in the six-month
period ended June 30, 2005 compared to $3.7 million in the same period in 2004. We used this cash
flow to pay down debt of $53.3 million and to fund our capital expenditures of $21.1 million in the
six months ended June 30, 2005. Our outstanding debt at June 30, 2005 was $374.0 million, compared
to $427.3 million at December 31, 2004. At June 30, 2005, we had no outstanding borrowings on our
$600 million revolving line of credit. We paid down a $23 million private placement note when it
matured on January 2, 2005. Our net debt-to-total capital ratio was 28.0% at June 30, 2005, down
from 33.6% at December 31, 2004.
In June 2005, we replaced our $335 million credit facility with a $600 million, five-year,
unsecured revolving credit facility with fifteen banks. The $335 million facility was scheduled to
mature in October 2006. At June 30, 2005, we had $15.6 million of letters of credit outstanding
under our $600 million credit facility with availability to issue an additional $34.4 million of
letters of credit. The new $600 million syndicated credit facility requires that we maintain a
minimum net worth and interest coverage ratio, and a maximum leverage ratio and includes
restrictions on the amount of cash dividends we may pay. The Company intends to use the new credit
facility for working capital and general corporate purposes, internal growth initiatives and
funding acquisitions.
13
Table of Contents
On July 1, 2005, we completed the acquisition of Chapel Steel Corp. and funded the $94.2 million
purchase price and the pay down of approximately $16.8 million of Chapel’s debt with borrowings on
our new revolving line of credit.
The Company also has $370 million of outstanding senior unsecured notes issued in private
placements of debt. The outstanding senior notes bear interest at an average fixed rate of 6.17%
and have an average remaining life of 4.5 years, maturing from 2005 to 2013.
Both the $335 million syndicated credit agreement and the senior notes became secured on July 1,
2003 concurrent with our acquisition of Precision Strip, Inc. The personal property pledged as
collateral included, but was not limited to, the outstanding securities of each of our material
corporate subsidiaries. The security interest was to terminate when we met certain conditions,
including a required leverage ratio. In the first quarter of 2005 the security interest granted
under our syndicated credit facility and our senior note agreements was automatically released as
we met the required conditions of the release. The senior note agreements and our new $600 million
credit facility are unsecured.
In May 2005, we amended and restated our stock repurchase program authorizing up to an additional
six million shares of our common stock to be repurchased. We did not repurchase any shares of our
common stock during the six-month period ended June 30, 2005. Proceeds from the issuance of common
stock upon exercise of stock options during the first half of 2005 were $6.2 million.
Capital expenditures were $21.1 million for the six months ended June 30, 2005. We had no material
changes in commitments for capital expenditures, operating lease obligations or purchase
obligations as of June 30, 2005, as compared to those disclosed in our table of contractual
obligations included in our Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004, other than the
acquisition of Chapel Steel Corp. noted above. We anticipate that funds generated from operations
and funds available under our line of credit will be sufficient to meet our working capital and
capital expenditure needs and to fund acquisitions in the foreseeable future.
Seasonality
Some of our customers may be in seasonal businesses, especially customers in the construction
industry. As a result of our geographic, product and customer diversity, however, our operations
have not shown any material seasonal trends. Revenues in the months of November and December
traditionally have been lower than in other months because of a reduced number of working days for
shipments of our products and holiday closures for some of our customers. We cannot assure you
that period-to-period fluctuations will not occur in the future. Results of any one or more
quarters are, therefore, not necessarily indicative of annual results.
Goodwill
Goodwill, which represents the excess of cost over the fair value of net assets acquired, amounted
to $341.8 million at June 30, 2005, or approximately 21.1% of total assets or 37.1% of consolidated
shareholders’ equity.
Pursuant to SFAS No. 142, we review the recoverability of goodwill annually or whenever significant
events or changes occur which might impair the recovery of recorded costs. Our annual impairment
tests of goodwill were performed as of November 1, 2004 and it was determined that the recorded
amounts for goodwill are recoverable and that no impairment existed. We are not aware of any
significant events or changes that would affect the recoverability of those amounts as of June 30,
2005.
Critical Accounting Policies
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations discusses our
unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States of America. When we prepare these financial
statements, we are required to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of
assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the
financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during
14
Table of Contents
the reporting period.
On an on-going basis, we evaluate our estimates and judgments, including those related to accounts
receivable, inventories, deferred tax assets, goodwill and intangible assets and long-lived assets.
We base our estimates and judgments on historical experience and on various other factors that we
believe to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for our
judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities
that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates
under different assumptions or conditions.
For further information regarding the accounting policies that we believe to be critical accounting
policies and that affect our more significant judgments and estimates used in preparing our
consolidated financial statements see our December 31, 2004 Form 10-K.
Item 3. Quantitative And Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
In the ordinary course of business, we are exposed to various market risk factors, including
changes in general economic conditions, domestic and foreign competition, foreign currency exchange
rates, and metals pricing and availability. Additionally, we are exposed to market risk primarily
related to our fixed rate long-term debt. Market risk is the potential loss arising from adverse
changes in market rates and prices, such as interest rates. Decreases in interest rates may affect
the market value of our fixed rate debt. Under our current policies, we do not use interest rate
derivative instruments to manage exposure to interest rate changes. Based on our debt, we do not
consider the exposure to interest rate risk to be material. Our fixed rate debt obligations are
not callable until maturity.
Item 4. Controls And Procedures
Under the supervision and with the participation of the Company’s management, including the
Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, the Company carried out an
evaluation of the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Company’s disclosure controls
and procedures pursuant to Rule 13a-15 or 15d-15(e) under the Securities Act of 1934, as amended.
Based upon that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer concluded
that, as of the end of the period covered in this report, the Company’s disclosure controls and
procedures are effective in timely alerting them to material information relating to the Company
required to be included in the Company’s periodic filings with the SEC. There have been no changes
in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting during the quarter ended June 30, 2005
that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control
over financial reporting.
This Form 10-Q may contain forward-looking statements relating to future financial results. Actual
results may differ materially as a result of factors over which Reliance Steel & Aluminum Co. has
no control. These risk factors and additional information are included in the Company’s Annual
Report on Form 10-K.
15
Table of Contents
PART II — OTHER INFORMATION
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
| (a) | The annual meeting of Reliance Steel & Aluminum Co. shareholders was held on May 18, 2005. | ||
| (b) | [Need not be answered because (1) proxies for the meeting were solicited pursuant to Regualtion 14A under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, (2) there was no solicitation in opposition to management’s nominees as listed in the proxy statement, and (3) all such nominees were elected.] | ||
| (c) | The following is a brief description of matters voted upon at the meeting: | ||
| Three directors were elected at the annual meeting. Douglas M. Hayes: 27,394,241 shares were voted for election and 2,343,124 shares were withheld. Franklin R. Johnson: 27,847,708 shares were voted for election and 1,889,657 shares were withheld. Leslie A. Waite: 27,663,844 shares were voted for election and 2,073,521 shares were withheld. | |||
| The Company’s Directors Stock Option Plan was amended and restated to provide for annual grants of stock options and to make the expiration date of such stock option ten years from the date of grant. The amendment was approved: 22,989,724 shares were voted for the proposal, 4,538,601 shares were voted against it and 462,536 shares abstained. | |||
| Based upon the recommendation of the Audit Committee, Ernst & Young LLP was selected as the Company’s independent registered accounting firm to perform the annual audit of the financial statements of the Company and its subsidiaries for 2005. The selection was approved: 29,167,189 shares were voted for the proposal, 566,383 shares were voted against it and 3,793 shares abstained. |
Item 6. Exhibits
31.1
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) and Rule 15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended | |
31.2
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) and Rule 15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended | |
32
|
Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
16
Table of Contents
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly
caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
| RELIANCE STEEL & ALUMINUM CO. |
||||
| Dated: August 9, 2005 | By: | /s/ David H. Hannah | ||
| David H. Hannah | ||||
| Chief Executive Officer | ||||
| By: | /s/ Karla Lewis | |||
| Karla Lewis | ||||
| Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
||||
17